Showing posts with label 1966. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1966. Show all posts

Sunday, March 26, 2023

MOVIE REVIEW: THE PORNOGRAPHERS (1966)

 

Directed by Shohei Imamura


Written by Shohei Imamura and Koji Numata


Adapted from a novel by Akiyuki Nozaka


Cinematography by Shinsaku Himeda


Edited by Matsuo Tanji


Art Directed by Hiromi Shiozawi and Ichiro Takada


Music by Toshiro Mayuzumi


Produced by Shohei Imamura, Jiro Tomoda, and Issei Yamamoto


Starring

Shoichi Ozawa as Subu

Sumiko Sakamoto as Haru

Keiko Sakawa as Keiko

Masaomi Kondo as Koichi


. . .


"I thought an orgy would cheer me up."


. . .


Review by William D. Tucker.


Subu is an Osaka-based pornographer-pimp-orgy-booker-aphrodisiac-peddler. He shoots fuck flicks. He arranges private screenings. He writes and self-publishes dirty books. Subu has busted his ass cultivating a clientele of middle-aged businessmen looking to purchase boner pills of dubious provenance. Subu has a relationship with a madam who provides him with sex workers who can play the ever in-demand role of Eternal Virgin for married men in need of escape from their wives. He arranges orgies and group gropes. Subu might be a sleazebag in our oh-so-pristine eyes, but he's never short of clients. He'd tell you that he fills a vital social need by providing relief to sexually repressed patriarchs. Subu's grind is relentless even as he's hassled by gangsters and cops. For all the shit he has to put up with you'd think he would just get a regular job. Fragmentary flashbacks suggest he was sexually abused as a child, which may account for his outlaw tendencies. 


To be clear, The Pornographers is a rigorously un-sexy film. It is about the manufacture of certain kinds of fantasies, but we never see finished products. Pleasure is fleeting, if not just out of reach. Subu is devoted to his various smutty gigs, yet also a moralizing hypocrite when convenient. What we see of the making of porn is procedural almost to the point of tedium, relieved only by the grotesque follies of seeing amateurs blunder through gauntlets of cringe. Subu's on-camera talent is recruited in an entirely ad hoc fashion, usually based on sizes of genitalia, willingness to disrobe, willingness to work cheap etc. Subu has a couple of other guys who function as his crew and post-production staff, and that's about it. Subu's market is pretty much exclusively male and heterosexual. The kinkiest his movies get is a spit roast involving two guys and a girl, and one of the guys is an American. The fact that all of this is conveyed obliquely is a testament both to the cleverness of the direction and the stupefying banality of so much pornographic material. Even one of Subu's fellow pornographers professes his exclusive interest in masturbation which, especially in this context, suggests a triumph of imagination and self-sufficiency. By contrast, Subu's past trauma has, perhaps, made him ill-at-ease inside his own mind. 


Subu's personal life is both a disaster zone and about as perverse as one would expect from a Shohei Imamura film. Subu's banging his landlady, Haru, who carries a torch for her dead husband whom she believes has reincarnated as a carp. This holy carp lives in a fishtank in Haru's bedroom, often observing her during coitus with Subu. Haru has a creepy incest thing going with her teenage son, Koichi. Haru beats herself up over her lack of faithful widowhood, and We the Audience get to watch as she devolves into insanity. Meanwhile, Subu attempts to seduce Haru's teenage daughter, Keiko. You see, much like that popular car crashing franchise, it's all about family.


The Pornographers frames its action in widescreen black and white consisting of highly expressive shadows and gritty location shooting. Often the camera is positioned at a distance, like we're private eyes or secret morality police surveilling the characters, taking notes, building dossiers. The style and tone swings from grimy bathroom sink naturalism to bleak-ass comedy of cruelty to expressionistic nightmare mode. One bravura yet borderline inexplicable longshot involves two people speaking in the foreground while a woman approaches us from the deep background of an ominously long hallway. As the woman draws near, the reality of the film transitions from quotidian drama to erotic fantasy.  Imamura crosses the borderline between objective sociology and subjective psychoanalysis with aplomb. 


The Pornographers takes a huge leap into grotesque satire in its final scenes as Subu becomes totally disillusioned with his life, his profession, Reality Its Own Self. Some of the last shots involve a diminutive houseboat adrift among huge cargo freighters. Subu's porno-grind has seemingly mutated beyond the bounds of outlaw capitalism and into the realms of blue sky research and development. Subu goes from being a rigorously disturbing Imamura protagonist to becoming something like an Edogawa Rampo villain. It might even be a kind of piss-take on that sort of thing. Admittedly, Subu's innovations seem quaint by today's standards, but for 1966 the dude was definitely getting high on his own supply. Watching that houseboat drift away, it's hard not to see it as a happy ending for a deeply troubled man. Subu might make your skin crawl, Dear Reader, but he existed as a kind of vanishing mediator of heterosexual dysfunctions and disillusionments. One Subu floats free, and no doubt another Subu'll rotate into position . . . and then, in the fullness of time, along comes the Internet . . .

Monday, November 22, 2021

MOVIE REVIEW: THE FACE OF ANOTHER (1966)

Directed and Produced by Hiroshi Teshigahara
Screenplay by Kobo Abe, based on his original novel
Music by Toru Takemitsu
Sound by Junosuke Okuyama
Cinematography by Hiroshi Segawa
Lighting by Mitsuo Kume
Art Direction by Arata Isozaki and Masao Yamazaki
Set Decoration by Kenichiro Yamamoto
Edited by Yoshi Sughihara
Still Photography by Yasuhiro Yoshioka
Sculptures by Tomio Miki
Titles Designed by Kiyoshi Awazu

Starring
Tatsuya Nakadai as Mr. Okuyama
Machiko Kyo as Mrs. Okuyama
Mikijiro Hira as Psychiatrist
Kyoko Kishida as Nurse
Miki Irie as Radiation Scarred Girl
Bibari Maeda as Beer Hall Singer

---

"Is it my true self that's getting drunk, or the mask?"

---

Review by William D. Tucker. 


Mr. Okuyama lost his face in an explosion in a factory. This is one of those things that wasn't supposed to happen. It's not like he worked there on the regular, y'know-he was an at-a-distance supervisor. Mr. Okuyama spent most of his days in cushy, modish 1960s offices, smoking cigarettes, perhaps complaining about how much time and money his wife spends on her gem-polishing classes, occasionally flirting with the beautiful young female secretary, and, oh yeah, doing some actual work, now and again? I assume he met with buyers, and took down orders, and then the drudges on the factory floor executed the dictates from home office. But, there comes a time when management must venture out among the worker drones and BOOM! Mr. Okuyama loses his face. 

Mr. Okuyama is first seen in an X-ray camera view-he's nothing more than an eerie talking skull. He numbly describes how and why he ended up in the factory on that fateful day. He's full of irrational guilt-the explosion came about because of a technical error, a fuck-up-and yet Mr. Okuyama invokes his "technical background" as though that should've been a mystical ward against harm. He put in the years. He paid his dues. Nothing bad was ever supposed to happen to him, certainly not on the job. Certainly nothing so . . . random . . . so . . . unplanned . . .

Mr. Okuyama is speaking, as it turns out, not to We the Audience, but to a Psychiatrist who specializes in replacing lost and/or mangled body parts and skin tissues with artificial replicas. This Psychiatrist has seemingly taken on the task of bridging the perceived gap between mind and body, which is pretty damn progressive, I think, moving beyond the internal fantasias of Freud and Jung, and engaging with people as they are-as bodies in time and space. 

But, alas, this is a movie, which means our Psychiatrist must be some kind of a Frankenstein, and therefore obsessed with bizarre and taboo projects that go beyond the norms and ethics of medicine. I mean, if this was just a straightforward saga of healing and making one whole and resilient, would we watch? Would we care? I probably wouldn't, if you must know, and what does that say about me?

William gasps, and takes up a cat o' nine tails-the old naval whip-to flagellate himself for his perversity. 

Our Psychiatrist sees in Mr. Okuyama a suitable test subject for a new way of life. Mr. Okuyama is obviously traumatized by his experiences and therefore justifiably angry and hurt and lost. But our Psychiatrist also detects a discontent that goes back well before the accident and begins to finesse the faceless man towards a radical form of therapy. 

Of course, our Psychiatrist offers pro forma hand-wringing about "ethics" and "potential dangers," but this is all calculated to push the macho, hard-driving Okuyama into taking a plunge. Once Okuyama agrees, our Psychiatrist blithely drops all reservations and gets to work. 

Our Psychiatrist constructs a new face for Mr. Okuyama out of an advanced form of rubbery plastic that can function as a skin analog. This New Face shall enable Mr. Okuyama to become a New Man and thereby lead a New Life. 

Which is terrific, right! Especially for the 1960s. 

If this were a comic book or a TV show-as opposed to an adaptation of a rigorously deranged Kobo Abe novel-this new putty face technology would allow Mr. Okuyama to become a master of disguise and fight gangsters and solve crimes and shit.

But because this is indeed an adaptation of a rigorously deranged Kobo Abe novel . . . that's not how it goes down. 

What our Psychiatrist is after is satisfaction for his own curiosity: what if you give someone a face that they can put on and take off like a hat, a coat, a scarf, a pair of pants, what happens when we can do that? Hmm? What happens when you enable someone to put on identity like you put on your clothes in the morning or take 'em off in the evening? 

How does that play out?

Well . . . it depends on the quality of the removable face . . . and it depends on the nature of the test subject doesn't it? If the face is convincing enough . . . and if the person wearing it commits to that New Face . . .

. . . well . . .

Of course, Mr. Okuyama is a Frankenstein's Creature to some degree. But not absolutely. Yes, our Psychiatrist pushes him down a strange path, but our defaced industrialist is a bit of a self-aware monster, as it turns out. The tense domestic conversations between Mr. and Mrs. Okuyama consist of terror and philosophy like something out of Edward Albee directed by Roger Corman. It becomes clear that Mr. Okuyama has a grotesque and toxic sense of entitlement over his wife's mind and body, and proceeds to use the New Face to assume a New Self and thereby seduce her as though they are strangers all over again. 

But maybe they were strangers all along. Yes, this is one of those movies that sees husband-and-wife shit as a form of social theater, and I tend to agree, but I imagine it won't sit too well with the "family values" crowd, but whatever does with those folks, y'know?

Mr. Okuyama uses his New Face to set up a double life. He approaches people who have met him before and dares them to see through his mask. There is a dizziness which comes with this freedom. And a giddiness which our Psychiatrist shares, as these two men hang out in a German beer hall-I guess this is to Japan what phony "Irish" pubs are to America-and plotting a brave new world where we will all become as strangers to one another and fly free of social gravity, and mold our fates as we mold our New Faces of Putty-

Honestly, this should all be a lot of fun, right? But I think our Psychiatrist picked the wrong test subject, and, also, I think, if you really pay attention,  our Psychiatrist is also an insincere asshole who gets off on screwing with his subject, but doesn't want to be on the hook when it all goes bad. We come to find out that our Psychiatrist-who is charming as fuck it must be said-is leading his own double life by cheating on his wife with his loyal nurse assistant. It's one of those infidelities that happens basically in the light of day. Our Psychiatrist is a successful man and therefore he gets to fuck around on his wife with no real consequences. And no mask required!

Mr. Okuyama is, essentially, getting his wife to cheat on him . . . with himself. Although-because this is a Kobo Abe story-the question arises: if a relationship is fraudulent, and loveless . .  aren't we always fucking around with a stranger . . . just one we happened to be chained to by marriage?

Maybe, just maybe, going to the extra effort of putting on a mask actually just affirms what we already know: that life is already a form of social theater, and we are different people in different contexts/relationships, and our troubles grow from rigid adherence to roles we either choose or are imposed upon us.

Meanwhile . . . there's another thread involving a young woman with a radiation scarred face. She's sexually harassed by young men in the street who don't see her scars at first, and then express revulsion when they do. This young woman works as a volunteer at a psychiatric hospital for World War II veterans. As she arrives at the hospital we see men muttering to themselves and in catatonic states and we hear the manic, barking voice of Hitler on the sound mix. Perhaps some of these insane soldiers think Uncle Adolf is still transmitting orders to their brains. A group of men play an open-ended baseball game that gets interrupted by hallucinatory air raids and phantasmagorical confusions about who's higher on the chain-of-command-basically, a super-fucked-up version of The Sandlot

The scarred young woman does laundry for these damaged souls, and, for her trouble, one of the old soldiers tries to rape her. She's able to get away, even as we hear Hitler barking away again on the sound mix.

I find these scenes to be the darkest in the whole movie. They seem to depict the madness of war and fascism-the obsession with rigid roles, and hierarchies and the resort to force-and link it to a terrifying misogyny. You hear the voice of Hitler as a Japanese soldier attempts to rape a woman who tries to show compassion and bring comfort to troubled souls, for Christ's sakes!

Yeah . . . maybe this situation goes deeper than the "talking cure" can touch.

And these scenes lend a creepiness to the tacky German beer hall bits . . .aren't Mr. Okuyama and our Psychiatrist plotting their own kind of "putsch?" Sure, sure, it could just be a couple of entitled men getting deep up their own asses as they toss back too much beer, and dose themselves with a little morphine from the secure cabinet . . . but they do see themselves as superior. And they ultimately have a vision of all people as infinitely malleable and carried along by fashion and social pressures and fate . . . why not use these insights to live as you please?

The entire world was convulsed by war not so long ago. Japan's rulers led the nation down a road of empire and humiliating defeat. Unspeakable savagery practiced by those who claimed supremacy over all others. The slaughter was incalculable. Japan was firebombed and nuked without mercy when they refused to surrender. Entire families and cities and histories obliterated. Not so long ago.

And now-1966-Japan finds itself between the nuclear powers of USA and USSR. US military bases on Japanese soil launch aggression against Vietnam. The whole situation could spark off into global nuclear armageddon. 

So why cling to a past or even your own face? Especially when the same old savagery wells up out of the abyss of the human heart over and over again. 

Yesterday's Righteous Victors . . . Today's Villains . . . and what will Tomorrow bring?

In the German beer hall, a beautiful woman sings of a stranger she sees in the fog. Is this stranger a lover from the past? Jack the Ripper? A new dictator? A colleague from work? Godzilla? A new friend? An old friend? A drunk?

Later, our Psychiatrist and Mr. Okuyama have a seemingly shared vision of a crowd of their fellow citizens exiting a movie theater with bizarre faces of clay. 

Do they see the truth, or is this their warped vision?

Or is it the common perception, clarified?

Maybe, our Psychiatrist and Mr. Okuyama had to take the long way round to realize what everyone sorta already knew but tried so very hard to forget. 

Wednesday, February 17, 2021

MOVIE REVIEW: THE SWORD OF DOOM (1966)

 Directed by Kihachi Okamoto

Cinematography by Hiroshi Murai

Edited by Yoshitami Kuroiwa

Music by Masaru Sato


Starring 

Tatsuya Nakadai as Ryunosuke Tsukue

Toshiro Mifune as Toranosuke Shimada



“Power without perception is spiritually useless, and therefore of no true value.”

-dialogue from the film Fist of the North Star (1986)


Review by William D. Tucker. 


Japan: 1860s: armed factions fight for and against the military Shogunate and the  divine Emperor. The Shogun wishes to strike a profitable deal with the foreigners from the West. The Emperor demands the expulsion of all foreign devils and total loyalty as a godlike absolute ruler over all. It is a time of violence. Men sharpen their blades and train rigorously in all forms of martial arts to wage wars covert and overt to determine the fate of the nation . . .


Ryunosuke Tsukue is a master swordsman with a strangely passive sword-fighting style: he squares off with an opponent, lowers his blade, lowers his eyes-he is leaving himself open to attack. Ryunosuke’s opponent takes the opportunity. Ryunosuke strikes this opponent-whoever he happens to be-dead with a single stroke of his sword. This master swordsman has perhaps made himself so sensitive to the sounds of his opponent’s body-maybe even to the changes in the currents of the air as a person maneuvers themselves to try to gain advantage in a duel-that he might not even need to look at his attacker to vanquish them. 


Ryunosuke is a wandering swordsman with no master, no loyalty to either Shogun or Emperor. He doesn’t seem to be associated with any criminal gangs. He is rejected as a perverted embodiment of evil by his old-fashioned kendo schoolmaster father. You could say Ryunosuke is his own master. Ryunosuke wanders Japan, getting into fights with other swordsmen, or, if he can find no one to duel, he might just kill a random person-like an elderly pilgrim praying at a Buddhist shrine by the roadside. Ryunosuke will also enter kendo competitions in order to “accidentally” crack open an opponent’s skull with a wooden sword and still be within the bounds of the rules. 


Eventually, Ryunosuke’s prowess and ruthlessness attracts the attention of armed political extremists who wish to use this master swordsman as an assassin. Ryunosuke has no political or moral convictions. He is neither a conformist nor a true believer. He fights fiercely, yet not from fear of death. Ryunosuke doesn’t draw his sword for self-defense or idealism. He enjoys killing as an end unto itself. He is a serial killer wearing the disguise of a mercenary swordsman for hire. Or, maybe he just sees killing for what it is stripped of the empty, self-justifying rhetoric of politics and religion. 


Ryunosuke goes through the motions of being a Japanese man in the 1860s. He ends up with a wife and a child. He drinks sake in the evenings to unwind. He dutifully carries out assassinations for the political faction that claims him . . . but these are not people or actions he loves. 


Well, the sake is okay. The killing is good. But he has no emotional connections to anyone or anything. Ryunosuke doesn’t seem to have emotions save for sadism and cruel, ironic amusement at how he continues to exist in a world of hypocrisy and stupidity. Ryunosuke is married to his sword. His face is a creepy, unblinking mask. He is a collection of gestures trying to pass for human. It’s not even clear if he gets truly drunk off of the sake-he might just be performing drunkenness to enhance the illusion of being human. What he is at heart is a maelstrom of violence disguised as a person. In turbulent times, no one seems to notice. Or care.


Ryunosuke, during one of his assassination gigs, finds himself witness to the spectacle of a sword master slaying many opponents who is possibly his equal: Toranosuke Shimada. Shimada is killing Ryunosuke’s fellow assassins in the extremist political faction. Ryunosuke should be joining his comrades in battle . . . but Ryunosuke has never had comrades. Ryunosuke just lets people think he has a sense of duty so he can have a warrant to kill. But Ryunosuke finds himself frozen before the magnificent technique of Shimada. Shimada is as fearsome as Ryunosuke but he spares the life of a helpless would-be assassin. Shimada has the conscience and sense of mercy that Ryunosuke lacks. 


Two swordsmen. One evil. One moral. Both capable of unleashing maelstroms of slashing carnage. Surely, if they clashed it would be like metaphysical matter and antimatter in collision. All would cease. 


Okay, maybe that’s taking things too far.


But it is certainly likely both Ryunosuke and Shimada would fight each other so ferociously that they would both perish of their wounds. Neither are afraid to die, yet Ryunosuke lives to kill. If Ryunosuke dies, he can’t kill anymore. Weirdly, absurdly . . . Ryunosuke must refuse to engage the worthiest opponent he is likely to ever encounter in his life so that he can keep on killing numerous lesser foemen and experience the one joy he is capable of having. 


Yeah, Ryunosuke is a sick and twisted fuck. 


Because Ryunosuke refuses to draw his sword, Shimada dismisses him with a disdainful glance, and strides away into the night.


Throughout The Sword of Doom, we get subjective camera work that puts us in the frightful perspective of Ryunosuke. We even get some first person shots that come oh-so-close to anticipating the steady-stalking camera work of John Carpenter’s Halloween-the one true slasher film of all time, forget all those superfluous sequels and dumbass remakes. In Halloween we have the Shape-who may once have been a person-a masked engine of murder who has no mercy and no discernible humanity. The Shape is a pure terror invading an anodyne suburban landscape unprepared to ward off a monster of pure malevolence. Ryunosuke is a monster born in a time of violence and paranoia whose ruthlessness and murderous spirit make him valuable to the powers that be. Maybe the Shape, after all, is the reincarnation of Ryunosuke-no, the reincarnation of the maelstrom that once wore the disguise of “Ryunosuke Tsukue.”


Of course, you can draw all kinds of bizarre connections in the realm of cinema, with all its recurring tropes and motifs and what have you. 


It’s weirdly satisfying-comforting,even-to construct patterns to explain the recurrence of senseless violence across time. 


Which is funny in a sicko sort of way.


Because another thing that The Sword of Doom and Halloween’78 have in common?


They both end with their human-disguised murder machines still at large.  


It can be a harsh realm out there, people. 


It really can.